May Day is coming fast upon us. Odd child that I was, I looked forward to this holiday for the chance to work with my Aunt Irma to make up folded paper baskets which I hung on doors around our Astor Court neighborhood. I was of course oblivious to the pagan roots of the traditional rising of the sap celebration, let alone the commemoration of the Haymarket Riot celebrated (still?) in the Communist world. Among my socialist friends May 1st is International Workers Day. Oh, that reminds me; I started out to write about the Port of Astoria elections.
As related to the elections, May 1st is the day the ballots are to be mailed. I’m thinking that it’s getting to be time to decide which candidates to support. During my failed attempt to secure a Commission seat two years ago, the campaign was in full swing by now. The issues are similar this time around, but they’ve matured. The inadequate oversight and fiscal recklessness of the veteran commissioners, as documented in The Daily Astorian, has been added to the disrespect for the public demonstrated by the railroading of the Calpine lease. LNG is more of a side issue this election, but not insignificant.
I’ll take the plunge and let everyone know who I support, and then brace myself for your comments. First off let me say that I’m pleased that viable candidates are willing to serve, and replace the incumbents – because those currently sitting must go.
All registered voters in Clatsop County have the opportunity to vote for candidates in each of the three contested races for port commissioner. Let’s see who we have.
Okay, for Position 2, to serve out the remaining two years of Glenn Taggart’s term (Glenn resigned in the midst of controversy over possible abuse of his position for personal financial gain. There was certainly the specter of conflict-of-interest with the Western Oregon Waste transaction, some of the handling of Taggart Building project on Port property, and Floyd Holcom’s complaints. We may never know whether improprieties actually occurred, and ethics can have fuzzy lines…): Bernard Bjork, who was appointed last fall, by the other commissioners, to fill the vacancy. He fits in with that crowd, which pretty much disqualifies him. He has not distinguished himself in the time he’s served, and has even distanced himself from his old pal Commissioner Larry Pfund. I lost during the last election to Pfund, who later became so concerned about the mismanagement, secrecy and cover-ups at the Port, that he complained to the press and courageously spoke out at Commission meetings. Bjork told Pfund to stop his whining. Bjork is also a long-time LNG supporter and, incidentally spearheaded the campaign against me. No hard feelings, but please let’s give Bjork the boot.
Also up for Position 2 is John Dunzer. Well, he’s an unusual character. He’s berated the lack of intelligence of every elected official in Clatsop County, as I recall. He considers my loss in 2005 as a mandate for LNG development. He did endear himself to me when, at a candidate’s forum sponsored by the American Association of University Women, he turned to the then-current commissioners in a comment regarding the Calpine lease and said, “You fellers really screwed the pooch.” In spite of that high mark, Dunzer’s a dud.
That leaves us with Patrick McGee for Position 2. McGee is the clear choice by default, because he is not the others. But McGee is also an excellent choice. He immediately smelled the foul air around the backroom dealing of the Calpine lease. He is a powerful advocate for transparency in government, and he speaks out for government officials to be held accountable to their constituents. He has a passion for the beauty and livability of our community, and supports economic development compatible with our heritage. Some call him gruff; I call him to-the-point. I trust McGee to act conservatively with the Port finances. Sure, we disagree on some political matters, but listen folks this is a non-partisan race, and we need someone who will do right by this county. I’m pleased that Patrick McGee is willing to serve.
Now let’s look at Position 3, currently held by Jim Bergeron. Bergeron was one of the more promising commissioners years ago, but went south fast with a pre-lease endorsement of Calpine’s LNG deal. His misguided and irrational antics during the last election are only exceeded by the stubborn streak that must inspire running again. It may be a malignant form of pride. I appreciate the contributions Bergeron has made to preserving the history of fishing in this area, through his former work with Sea Grant. He’s really a pretty nice guy. But he made bad decisions around the lease, around the dredging fiasco, around management oversight, and regarding Port finances. Time to bail on Bergeron.
Fortunately, Bill Hunsinger is willing to take on Position 3. Hunsinger is a retired longshoreman with hands-on (literally) experience in a number of ports. He has not been shy in criticizing if not exposing malfeasance at the Port of Astoria. As outspoken as Hunsinger appears, he also has a level head. I have confidence that he will make informed and measured decisions as port commissioner. He wants to see jobs for our community, but he is also realistic and cautious about the type of jobs. He will be an excellent addition to the Commission.
Finally, there’s Position 4, with thick-skinned Commission President Don McDaniel facing three opponents. McDaniel has been back-peddling a bit of late, finally sort of embracing my two-year call for organizational and fiscal audits of Port structure and activities. I say “sort of” because what is underway is short of a charge to investigate the dark corners of the internal dealings (lease, dredging, insider profiteering, collusion to avoid public process) that appear to have tainted Port activities these past few years. McDaniel is a nice guy who should have stepped down. I think he’s running again fueled by that weird pride, or maybe just to prove that old guys can be tough. Dump Don.
Meet Jim Stroup, retired bar pilot, who has filed for Position 4. Actually I’m not sure where to meet him. Stroup has some experience on the Oregon Board of Maritime Pilots and as master of the State Steamship Company. I got this information from The Daily Astorian. Stroup might be okay, but where is he? I expect, perhaps unfairly, some sort of Internet presence to help me learn about the record and vision of candidates. It’s less than a month until the ballots are mailed. Time to get out of the house, if not onto the Web!
Another contender for Position 4 is Ted Thomas, who points to his political experience in the Boilermakers Union. Thomas has been a vocal critic of the Port, especially regarding procedural matters. He is a founder of Clean Slate, a PAC formed to find and support candidates to replace the incumbent port commission. Clean Slate foisted an admirable platform that emphasized open and responsive government. However, no candidates stepped forward to be embraced by (beholden to?) the PAC, so Thomas himself filed. Thomas expresses good intentions, but I don’t see him winning. He has limited ties to this area, and lacks a long-standing record regarding local issues. He also worked to defeat me in 2005. I don’t think that I hold a grudge, but Fins have long, if selective, memories.
That brings us to Position 4 candidate Kathy Sanders, probably the most capable of any in the Port race. Sanders is a former captain in the U.S. Air Force, now turned writer. I’ve spoke with her at length a couple of times, including at one of her Thursday morning coffees at the Blue Scorcher. Sanders is highly intelligent, inquisitive and not at all shy about digging in to uncover facts. She has done her research (which continues) to understand the challenges and potential of the Port. She has a strong commitment to wielding what power the Port has to drive sustainable economic growth. She’s clearly angry at the fiscal mismanagement that has left the Port struggling instead of leading. I find her to be a very realistic person who has the creativity to make the most out of what is available. This is an accessible forthright person who values transparency in government and who clearly believes in the Port’s mission to foster environmentally responsible economic development. This is the right person at the right time.
There you have it, for the Port of Astoria, Huhtala endorses:
Patrick McGee, Position 2
Bill Hunsinger, Position 3
Kathy Sanders, Position 4
Comments?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
McGee, to me doesn't have the experience in politics, though he does know how to throw out sound bites on the call in radio show.
I fear any time we elect persons of strong religious convictions, Sanders, a writer of Christian books, and McGee want public displays of the 10 comandments. So will there be prayer before the Commission meetings? What is McGee's platform on LNG? I've read his posts on forums and I can't figurt out his opinion. It seems like he is against it, but some statements lead me to believe that he is only against certain aspects of it, but is for it in general
What is Hunsingers stance on lng? I'm surprised you would endorse him without knowing his stance. My take on Hunsinger is he wants jobs alright. If your a longshoresman. I remember him being critical if not against the haulout and cruiships. He has made statements against Bornsteins and the Taggert building for taking up "valuable space where longshoring activity could take place" It's just a matter of time before he is critical of Jason and Jeff's project. Yeah, he's for jobs alright. Longshore jobs. Not to mention he's not playing with a full deck of cards and he's an asshole.
Ah, good. That's a start. Well, I have known McGee quite a while and his anti-LNG stance is clear to me. I'll take his lack of political experience over Bjork any day. These are citizens stepping up for their community, not career politicians.
I worried initially about Sander's religious convictions. Once I got to know her, however, I was very impressed by her attitude toward taking on the Port. I don't see religion as a problem one way or another at the Commission. If this was the state legislature, then,yes, the potential for votes based on convictions would compel scrutiny of that potential. But why don't you meet her yourself: next chance is at Coffee Girl on Tuesday, 7:30 to 9 am.
I understand that Hunsinger has actually vacillated on LNG. He can be a bit boisterous in public comment, but he seems generally reasonable and, most important, respectful of public process and honest dealings in public service. At the very least he's a warm body who is not the incumbent Bergeron.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your thoughtful recommendations. I just wish you were running. But I suppose there's only so much fun one person can stand. ;-)
Thanks Peter, I appreciate your endorsement.
As far as the comment concerning posting the 10 Commandments goes, have no fear, that is not on my agenda.
What is on my agenda is responsible, fair, open and honest dealings at the Port.
We need transparency and public process in Port operations. If a mistake if made, it needs to be dealt with openly and honestly.
There needs to be accountability and checks and balances. The Executive Director should never be tasked to also be the
Chief Financial Officer, as was done under Peter Gearin.
We need a restructuring of the organizational chart, along with a a possible realignment of duties and responsibilities. Basically, we need to tighten up the management structure and have specific procedures in place to ensure open, fair competition.
Of absolute importance is the hiring of a new Executive Director. I would like to see an executive search done nationwide. We need the best, most experienced person we can find.
I am doing some "Coffee with Kathy" informal meetings and would love to meet anyone interested. The next one is tomorrow, Tuesday April 10th, at Coffee Girl on Pier 39, from 7:30 am to 9:00 am, longer if people hang out.
Please check my campaign website for other upcoming activities. The campaign is picking up speed and things are in flux so please check often. www.kathysanders.blogspot.com
I will be posting my platform on my website before the end of the week.
Kathy Sanders
Thank you very much for your endorsement Peter.
I am very flattered and honored to have your support and hope to make your choice, at least on my part, a wise and sound choice and invesment into "Our" Port's Future.
Post a Comment